Saturday, April 12, 2014

Cultural Hegemony (Sumblog 9)




In class we discussed the concept of cultural hegemony and related it to media in the United States of America. Cultural hegemony is the idea or concept that one nation or culture has an excessive influence into how other cultures should conduct themselves, both in terms of values and political and economic goals. The idea of cultural hegemony was promoted by the writings of the Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but he did not necessarily create the concept. A ruling class social structure has existed throughout human history in many regions.

 
American culture is centered on a thriving and diverse media industry. Through movies, television, music, and print entertainment, as well as the marketing of products through extensive advertising, American culture has a huge influence on the values of many nations where people aspire to a more consumer-based lifestyle. This influence is often seen in a negative light, as it has the potential to suppress local cultural expression to the point where diversity, in many forms, is lost.

One of the main arguments against cultural hegemony throughout history is that it is wrong to assume that smaller cultures are forced to take on the identity of more dominant ones. They do it by choice, and often go to extraordinary efforts to obtain access to foreign cultural ideas and products, despite an attempt to suppress this by their own governments. Another main argument against the concept of cultural hegemony is that, while dominant cultures may spread their influence to diverse regions, these regions tend to not abandon their own values and interests, but merely incorporate the new ones into a broader view of the good life.

Overall, cultural hegemony determines who has the most influence on those around them. This includes what the media portrays and how society acts. It is something that we do not often think of but is a vital part of our society.

2 comments:

  1. I like/agree with your statement that smaller cultures often take the identify of the dominant culture by choice--it seems that in day to day life, assimilation is the easier choice and it is arguably the smarter choice. It's hard to imagine the impact of cultural hegemony without the media's influence, I wonder what a model of this would look like? Is it even conceivable for there to be a unified cultural hegemony without a common source (the media) to spread it? To what extent does the existence of a dominant culture depend on the media?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's hard to comment on this without sounding like a broken record because I'm on the exact train of thought. The blogs statements and questions in the comment are fascinating. I think that if there were no media, cultural hegemony wouldn't be possible but if so then definitely not by choice but who's to say. Maybe if given enough time social influences could convincingly spread far enough.

    ReplyDelete